The concept suggests that in order for society to thrive and overcome its challenges, we need individuals who are willing to think outside the box and challenge the status quo. These individuals are those who are unafraid to take risks, explore new ideas, and push the boundaries of what is possible.
In contrast, the “square minds” refers to those who conform to the norms of society, follow the rules, and are hesitant to challenge the status quo. While square minds provide stability and structure to society, they may not be able to see beyond the immediate concerns and needs of their environment. As a result, they may be unable to anticipate and respond to the larger challenges that society may face.
Wild hearts, on the other hand, are often individuals who are creative, innovative, and willing to take risks. They are able to see beyond the immediate concerns and needs of society and envision a larger, more holistic picture. This perspective allows them to develop innovative solutions to complex problems, to take risks that others may not, and to inspire others to take action.
In this way, the concept suggests that wild hearts are essential to the survival of society, particularly in the face of challenges such as environmental degradation, social inequality, and political instability. It argues that it is the wild hearts who are able to see the big picture, often envision a better future, and inspire others to work towards that future. By embracing the wild hearts among us, society can tap into a wealth of creativity, innovation, and inspiration, and move towards a more sustainable and equitable future.