Alexandru R

The concept suggests that no matter how much you try to persuade or explain an idea to someone, if they don’t have the capacity or ability to understand it, they won’t be convinced. It is not just about the lack of knowledge, but also about the lack of capacity to perceive or comprehend a particular concept.

It is essential to acknowledge that people have different cognitive abilities, experiences, and backgrounds that shape their perspectives and beliefs. Therefore, what might be evident to one person may not be as apparent to another. For instance, a complex scientific theory may be easily understood by a trained scientist, but it might be challenging for someone who doesn’t have a scientific background.

This concept highlights the importance of understanding your audience when you are trying to convey a message. If you want to convince someone of something, you need to tailor your message to their level of understanding. This means using language that is appropriate for their level of education or expertise, breaking down complex ideas into simpler ones, and providing relatable examples that they can relate to. Having said that, there will always be concepts that are beyond some people’s ability to understand.

There is also something to be said about the role faith and trust can play in convincing people, and the implications. Individuals without the ability to comprehend a particular concept, regardless of the reason, can choose – and often do – to put their faith in a person they regard as an expert or a source of truth. Many factors contribute to this trust in others, none as powerful as our sociological tradition, i.e. we trust experts because that is our tradition as a society.

Although trust by tradition has worked well over time, trust in authority, even that of thought, has eroded in time. When people feel they cannot trust authority, they quickly and perhaps sentimentally seek to fill that gap. Trust by tradition might have worked before the age of information, when people’s access to new information was restricted to publications.

In the age we live today, trust has come full circle. We trusted people before because we realised it’s better to trust than not, because it works out better for us in the long run. Then we trusted people because they studied a particular subject and became experts. Now that we are at the end of the cycle, where will we turn next? Alas, the concept opens up more questions than answers.

The concept suggests that in order for society to thrive and overcome its challenges, we need individuals who are willing to think outside the box and challenge the status quo. These individuals are those who are unafraid to take risks, explore new ideas, and push the boundaries of what is possible.

In contrast, the “square minds” refers to those who conform to the norms of society, follow the rules, and are hesitant to challenge the status quo. While square minds provide stability and structure to society, they may not be able to see beyond the immediate concerns and needs of their environment. As a result, they may be unable to anticipate and respond to the larger challenges that society may face.

Wild hearts, on the other hand, are often individuals who are creative, innovative, and willing to take risks. They are able to see beyond the immediate concerns and needs of society and envision a larger, more holistic picture. This perspective allows them to develop innovative solutions to complex problems, to take risks that others may not, and to inspire others to take action.

In this way, the concept suggests that wild hearts are essential to the survival of society, particularly in the face of challenges such as environmental degradation, social inequality, and political instability. It argues that it is the wild hearts who are able to see the big picture, often envision a better future, and inspire others to work towards that future. By embracing the wild hearts among us, society can tap into a wealth of creativity, innovation, and inspiration, and move towards a more sustainable and equitable future.

The concept highlights the idea that language is not a static entity but that it is a constantly evolving system that is shaped by its users. As we use language to communicate, we are not only utilising the words and grammar that we have inherited from our predecessors, but we are also actively contributing to the ongoing development of the language itself.

The concept emphasises that our use of language has consequences beyond the immediate moment of communication. The language we use becomes a part of the larger linguistic landscape and is inherited by future generations. Therefore, it is important to be mindful of the language we use and the impact it may have on future generations.

Moreover, the concept implies that language is not only a means of communication but also a vehicle for cultural transmission. The language we use embodies the values, beliefs, and customs of the society in which it is spoken. As such, the language we shape reflects our cultural heritage and identity.

In this sense, the concept suggests that our use of language is not just a matter of personal preference or convenience but rather a responsibility that we owe to future generations. We are the stewards of our language, and it is our duty to shape it in a way that reflects our cultural heritage, values, and identity while also being accessible to future generations.

In conclusion, the concept emphasises the importance of being mindful of the language we use and the impact it may have on future generations. It suggests that our use of language is not just a matter of personal preference but rather a responsibility that we owe to our cultural heritage and to future generations.

The concept highlights how our past traumas can have a significant impact on our present desires. Trauma can create deep emotional wounds that remain unresolved and can lead to a range of maladaptive coping mechanisms, such as addiction or destructive behaviour. These coping mechanisms often stem from an intense desire to escape or numb the pain of past traumas.

Thus, desire can become a double-edged sword for individuals who have experienced trauma. On one hand, it can be a powerful motivator for healing and growth, driving individuals to seek positive experiences and relationships. On the other hand, it can also lead to unhealthy behaviours and a cycle of self-destruction if not properly addressed. Understanding the role that trauma plays in our desires can help us recognize and heal the wounds that drive them, ultimately leading to a healthier and more fulfilling life.

The concept suggests that our most profound past experiences are often hidden away in the recesses of our minds, in places we seldom explore or revisit. The concept also suggests that our desires are born of profound past experiences. These experiences may have been born from events in our distant past, and often have been suppressed due to societal or personal pressures.

The concept implies that these desires are not necessarily negative or sinister, but rather something that was once known and familiar to us. However, over time, our experiences may have become obscured by societal norms or defence mechanisms. Such is the case for trauma. Despite being hidden away, these experiences continue to exist and demand to be seen and heard. In this sense, trauma has a way of sneaking up on you when you’re least conscious of it, and desire is trauma’s sharpest sword.

“Desire is trauma’s sharpest sword.”

Our desires also possess a certain power or urgency. They are not simply passive thoughts or feelings, but rather forces that drive us towards self-discovery and personal fulfilment. The concept implies that in order to fully realise ourselves, we must confront these hidden experiences that have shaped our desires, bring them to the surface and grant them the justice they crave by acknowledging their existence.

In conclusion, our most impactful past experiences are often hidden away in the recesses of our minds, and they often show up as desire. In order to fully realise ourselves, we must confront these experiences and bring them to the light. It implies that our deepest desires are not something to be feared or ignored, but rather something that we should acknowledge for their role in shaping us, as people.

The concept of an order in the universe implies that everything in the cosmos is interconnected and works together in a precise and structured way. It suggests that every action we take, no matter how small, has an impact on the fabric of spacetime. This means that the universe is not just a collection of disparate entities, but rather a complex web of interdependent phenomena. Our ability to recognize and understand these changes is what we call the sixth sense or intuition. This innate sense allows us to perceive and interpret subtle cues in the environment, helping us make decisions and respond to changes in our surroundings.

The idea that we are an integral part of the cosmos emphasises that we are not separate from the universe, but rather an active component of it. We are not just passive observers, but active participants in the unfolding of the universe. Our ability to perceive and respond to changes in the fabric of spacetime reflects the deep connection we have with the cosmos. While we may not fully understand the mechanisms behind these phenomena, there is something to be said about the power of our intuition and our ability to sense the subtle changes in the universe. By recognizing and embracing this connection, we can develop a greater sense of empathy and understanding for the world around us, and our place in it.